CIS 6930 Spring 26

Logo

Data Engineering at the University of Florida

Presentation Rubric

Use this rubric when evaluating final presentations (Week 14).

Total Points: 150

Presentation Requirements

Point Conversion

Score Points (per criterion) Description
5 100% of weight Excellent
4 80% of weight Good
3 60% of weight Satisfactory
2 40% of weight Needs Work
1 20% of weight Incomplete

Scoring Scale

Score Meaning
5 Excellent - Conference-quality presentation
4 Good - Professional and engaging
3 Satisfactory - Gets the message across
2 Below Average - Hard to follow or missing elements
1 Poor - Does not meet basic requirements

Criteria

1. Content (30% = 45 points)

Does the presentation cover the essential elements?

Score Description
5 Comprehensive coverage; clear problem, approach, and results; insights shared
4 Good coverage of all key elements
3 Covers basics but missing depth in some areas
2 Incomplete coverage; key elements missing
1 Does not adequately present the work

Required Elements:


2. Clarity (25% = 37.5 points)

Is the presentation easy to follow?

Score Description
5 Crystal clear; excellent logical flow; complex ideas explained well
4 Clear and well-organized
3 Understandable but some confusing parts
2 Difficult to follow; organizational issues
1 Incomprehensible

Guiding Questions:


3. Demo/Visuals (20% = 30 points)

Are visuals and demonstrations effective?

Score Description
5 Compelling demo; excellent visuals; enhances understanding
4 Good demo/visuals that support the content
3 Adequate visuals; demo present but could be improved
2 Poor visuals or no demo when one would help
1 No visuals or completely ineffective

Guiding Questions:


4. Delivery (15% = 22.5 points)

Is the presentation professionally delivered?

Score Description
5 Confident, engaging, professional
4 Good delivery with clear communication
3 Adequate delivery; some nervousness or pacing issues
2 Difficult to hear or understand; poor pacing
1 Unprepared or unprofessional

Guiding Questions:


5. Q&A Handling (10% = 15 points)

Are questions handled effectively?

Score Description
5 Handles all questions confidently; provides insightful answers
4 Good responses to questions
3 Answers most questions adequately
2 Struggles with questions; incomplete answers
1 Cannot answer basic questions

Guiding Questions:


Review Template

## Presentation Review: [Name]

**Reviewer:** [Your Name]
**Presentation Time:** [X:XX]

### Scores

| Criterion | Score (1-5) | Weight | Points |
|-----------|-------------|--------|--------|
| Content | | 30% | /45 |
| Clarity | | 25% | /37.5 |
| Demo/Visuals | | 20% | /30 |
| Delivery | | 15% | /22.5 |
| Q&A Handling | | 10% | /15 |
| **Total** | | 100% | **/150** |

### Summary
[What is this project about? 2-3 sentences]

### Strengths
1.
2.

### Areas for Improvement
1.
2.

### Key Takeaway
[What's the one thing you'll remember about this project?]

Presentation Tips

Content

Delivery

Visuals

Demo Preparation


back