Data Engineering at the University of Florida
Use this rubric when evaluating final presentations (Week 14).
Total Points: 150 Format: 5-7 minute presentation with recorded demo Requirements: Slides (PDF in repo), recorded pipeline demo (2-3 min), in-class presentation
| Score | Meaning | % of Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Excellent — conference-quality | 100% |
| 4 | Good — professional and engaging | 80% |
| 3 | Satisfactory — gets the message across | 60% |
| 2 | Below average — hard to follow | 40% |
| 1 | Poor — does not meet requirements | 20% |
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 5 | Comprehensive: clear problem, approach, results, and insights |
| 4 | Good coverage of all key elements |
| 3 | Covers basics but missing depth in some areas |
| 2 | Incomplete; key elements missing |
| 1 | Does not adequately present the work |
Required elements: Problem statement, approach/methodology, demo, results, takeaway.
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 5 | Crystal clear; excellent logical flow; complex ideas explained well |
| 4 | Clear and well-organized |
| 3 | Understandable but some confusing parts |
| 2 | Difficult to follow; organizational issues |
| 1 | Incomprehensible |
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 5 | Compelling walkthrough; shows full pipeline; narrated; highlights LLM interactions |
| 4 | Good walkthrough that supports the presentation |
| 3 | Recording present but could be more effective or lacks narration |
| 2 | Recording has issues or does not illustrate key steps |
| 1 | No recording or recording is unusable |
Demo requirements: Pre-recorded screen capture, 2-3 minutes, voice narration, shows pipeline stages, LLM prompts/responses, and key outputs.
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 5 | Confident, engaging, professional, within time |
| 4 | Good delivery with clear communication |
| 3 | Adequate; some nervousness or pacing issues |
| 2 | Difficult to hear or understand; poor pacing |
| 1 | Unprepared or unprofessional |
# Presentation Review
**Presenter:** [Name]
**Reviewer:** [Your Name]
**Date:** [Date]
## Scores
| Criterion | Score (1-5) |
|-----------|-------------|
| Content | |
| Clarity | |
| Demo Recording | |
| Delivery | |
## Summary
[2-3 sentences about the presentation]
## Strengths
1.
2.
## Suggestions for Improvement
1.
2.
## Key Takeaway
[What will you remember from this presentation?]
Content: Open with a hook. Explain the problem before the solution. Show specific numbers in results. End with one clear takeaway.
Delivery: Practice at least twice. Speak to the audience, not the screen. Stay within 7 minutes.
Demo: Pre-load everything. Narrate each step. Show the most interesting part of the pipeline, not the setup.
Visuals: Large fonts (24pt minimum). Minimize text per slide. Include architecture diagrams. One idea per slide.